As the dust settles in the aftermath of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk’s assassination, prominent online influencers are poised and on hand to kick the dust up into the air again.

This is war, and anyone asking questions like “who really stands to gain from the USA being divided?” or has the gall to call for unity rather than division, is weak and not to be trusted.

Prominent Israel first influencer Laura Loomer has stated to her enormous following, that you cannot be kind to your enemy. You have to be vicious.

Right on script, Laura.

Large swathes of Americans that would have previously checked their watch each time the FBI told them the time, are now suddenly hanging on their every word.

Why? Because the FBI is telling them what they want to hear.

Charlie Kirk was killed by a crazy liberal kid with a trans lover. Phew, that’s that settled, then.

Ignore all the inconsistencies, ignore all the others that would stand to gain from this tragedy, ignore everything your eyes and ears tell you, the CCTV footage, the confession letter that was apparently destroyed, the text exchange between the supposed killer and his 22 year old boyfriend, that reads like it was written by a 53 year old guy trying to work out how to use ChatGPT.

Or the fact that in the text messages, reportedly from September 10th, Tyler is saying his grandad is freaking out as he recognises the gun as his own, but the image of the gun wasn’t released to the public until the following day.

Ignore all of the above.

Charlie Kirk was murdered by Tyler Robinson. Because… trust me bro.

Hours before the shooting, I recorded my weekly monologue where I stated we were about to enter false flag season, and sure enough, just a few hours after the show went live, we were all glued to our timelines, looking for news from the USA.

For clarity ‘false flag’ doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, it simply means what we are told happened, and who was behind it, is not the full story.

And me saying a false flag was coming wasn’t me being some Mystic Meg know it all. It was obvious. You could, and can feel it.

The fact that everything was being put in place, all the bait and traps laid to introduce solutions to yet to appear problems, told us that there was sure to be a problem around the corner any minute.

While some have refused to take a nibble on the fishing hook, it seems the overwhelming majority of people have.

The anger within those on the right, in no small part stoked by very well paid and algorithmically boosted agitators, has led, predictably, to them manifesting into what they once railed against.

The freedom of speech absolutist right, is now doxing and seeking the loss of employment for thousands of people on the left… for words.

They might not be nice words, even repulsive words, but they are words.

Celebrating the death of another is twisted and dark. I’m with you on that.

It’s as twisted and dark as those that regularly celebrate the death of Palestinians in Gaza, but hypocrisy is the human condition and you are never too far from a terminal case of it.

“Free speech is most important when people you don’t like, say things you don’t like”. said The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh.

He said that last year when the Democrats and Joe Biden were in the White House, and I wholeheartedly agree.

How strange then, to see him post the following now his side, Donald Trump and the Republicans are in charge. (Apparently in charge).

“My team and I have now gotten at least 25 people fired from their jobs for celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assisination. Should we keep going?”

Yeeeeeeah!!! cheered the mob.

Fire them all. Fire them from a cannon.

I’m sorry, but you are either free speech or you aren’t. There is no middle ground here.

People will come back and say that free speech shouldn’t be free of consequence.

Well, you were claiming it should be when you were being cancelled for words, and also, this isn’t just some organic thing.

This isn’t someone’s boss being outraged by their employee’s views, and relieving them of their duties.

Not that I’m on board with that either, but there is an argument that an employer might not want someone that celebrates death within their organisation.

I get that.

But this is a coordinated attempt by major political influencers to dox individuals and then have the baying mob contact their employers demanding their removal.

Some of these influencers are even providing templates for people to send.

There is also a point about human beings, to be made here

Human beings are imperfect.

They say stupid things. Mean things. Down right ridiculous things, at times. People make mistakes.

If you can sit there and honestly say you have never said anything stupid, mean, or ridiculous, then I will sit here, with great confidence, and call you a liar.

Do people truly deserve to lose their jobs, their ability to pay the bills, and feed their families, because they said something stupid online? Really? Is that where we are now?

The right is doing exactly what the left did to them when they were in power, and when the left get back into power again further down the line, they will do exactly the same to the right again.

Because that is what happens. The tribal DNA kicks in and the left and right continue to drag each other down the road to dystopian disaster, because both are so focused on ‘winning’ the culture battle, that neither of them realise they are both losing the war.

That war is on humanity and it doesn’t discriminate between left and right.

The puppet masters want no one to have freedom of speech, no one to have freedom of expression, and no one to have freedom of thought.

Your political or religious or social allegiances mean nothing to those making their moves on the grand chessboard.

To them, we are all Charlie Kirk.

We are all in the gunsights.

If you are not part of the much smaller than one percent, and I hate to break it to you, but you aren’t, then they care not about any of you. Any of us.

We are merely pawns to be moved, set against each other, and even sacrificed in order to further an agenda of complete control across the board.

The demons need us fighting with each other.

They need us focused on what divides us rather than what unites us.

It might not appear this way to you, whatever side you are on, because we have all been conditioned to focus on the differences rather than the similarities, but whomever you are, whatever end of the political spectrum you are, you have more in common with each other, than either of you do with those that claim to represent you.

You can apply that to Israel vs Palestine, Russia vs Ukraine, black vs white, straight vs gay, whatever.

If your ‘leaders’ whether elected or trending on social media, are telling you to hate your fellow human beings, they are not your friends and they do not have your best interests or indeed humanity’s best interests at heart.

They either knowingly or unknowingly work as agents for those that seek to pull us apart, and tear down society to rebuild it in the image of Orwell’s 1984 or Huxley’s Brave New World.

So as the likes of Laura Loomer tell us to be vicious and not to forgive our manufactured enemies, I will appeal to the United States, and indeed Charlie Kirk’s ‘Christian values’ by countering her with these words from the bible.

From the gospel of Matthew – “But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you”

John – “Beloved, let us love one another, because love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.”

Ephesians – “Be kind and tenderhearted to one another, forgiving each other just as in Christ, God forgave you.”

Colossians – “Therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, clothe yourselves with hearts of compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience. Bear with one another and forgive any complaint you may have against someone else. Forgive as the Lord forgave you.And over all these virtues put on love, which is the bond of perfect unity.”

Amen.

Yeah, and that’s the point.

A group united is a more formidable opponent. Whether that be a football team, or the population of a nation. 

A group at odds with each other spends its time focusing on its own differences, bickering with itself, rather than uniting against the overarching enemy that wants to destroy them both. 

When you say that aloud, and think about it calmly, it seems blatantly obvious. 

And yet we allow our true enemy to divide us constantly, daily. 

For anyone who still hasn’t fathomed out who the enemies of the people are, in the Not-United Kingdom at least, I would point your gaze towards a large limestone structure on the banks of the River Thames. 

A structure that houses a very large bell. 

And that’s just the Prime Minister. 

The selected officials that perform within that building, openly despise the people of this nation. 

That is nothing new. I’m not being partisan here. They’re all bastards with different coloured ties. 

It just seems that since the current government came to power last year, the desire to at least pretend you aren’t actively ruining everybody’s lives, has gone out the window. 

The government hates you and me, and they don’t care who knows it. 

So you would think that at this point the country would be united against them. 

You would think that the people would temporarily put down the fault lines they’ve allowed to be constructed between them, and for the sake of fighting a gaggle of tyrannical, authoritarian, war mongering Davos firsters, would leave their beef at the door, if only until such time as the war on the people has been repelled. 

But no. 

The tribalism is deep rooted. Through decades, even centuries of political manipulation carried down through the generations, the tribes are instead blaming each other for the woes of the world, rather than those in the positions of power, that are actively making the decisions to bring about those woes. 

The come and go politicians, with notable demonic exceptions like Tony Blair, who would bend over for satan for free, come into the political sphere, serve their masters… not you by the way… and then exit stage left into the comforts of parliamentary pensions, book deals, and well paid corporate advisory roles. 

But the permanent government remains. 

Read more: – “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand.” – Matthew 12:25

Small boat crossings of illegal immigrants into England have now hit 50,000, since Labour took control of the UK, with a mandate to, in their words, “smash the gangs”. 

That’s an unvetted male migrant entering the now borderless nation every eleven minutes. 

Completely unsustainable numbers even for the most fluoride calcified ‘refugees welcome’ placard waver. 

It’s not sustainable, because it isn’t meant to be. 

People are slowly waking up to the fact that none of this is happening organically, and none of it is down to government ‘incompetence’. 

Yes, Starmer, Lammy, Miliband, Reaves and the rest of the Labour front bench are a gaggle of ignoramuses, but it isn’t them that ultimately make the decisions. 

That role falls to the permanent government. 

Those whose names you don’t hear, and faces you don’t see on the 10 o clock news. 

The high ranking civil servants maintain their roles no matter what colour rosette has its name above the door of Downing Street. 

That’s why it’s an irrelevance what government the people elect, whether it be the Tories saying they will ‘Stop the boats’ or the Labour Party claiming they will ‘Smash the gangs”, nothing changes for the better, and the number of people entering the country goes up. 

The hardest to fathom realisation that growing numbers of people are awakening to, is that the traffickers aren’t in-fact the Russians, or the Chinese, as the establishment media would have you believe.

It isn’t even the gangs that are putting migrant men into dinghies in Northern France. 

Sure, the gangs are playing their role, but they are facilitators, not instigators. 

Even at the most basic level, because it goes even deeper, if the Government wasn’t housing the boat riders in hotels, and now social housing, then the incentive wouldn’t be there to get in the boat in the first place. 

The UK Government are in-fact the traffickers, and the gangs are merely a cog in that very well greased machine. 

The intentional destruction of this nation, and many other nations in the west, has many cogs, and it infiltrates every single aspect of our daily lives. 

So in recent weeks, I’ve started looking at the west, but more specifically the UK, through the lens of someone that wanted to destroy it. 

What would I do? What would I attack? Who would I attack?

Well, I would attack the natives for a start. 

Through mass unfiltered immigration I would change demographics, and community cohesion, and I would attack the natives for resisting. 

I would marginalise, disenfranchise and démoralise,them. I would make their lives miserable, joyless, void of purpose and meaning. 

I would attack their communities, their places of social interaction. 

The high street. 

The pub. 

I would attack them financially through cost of living,and  by cutting funding to the most vulnerable of them. 

I would defund community programs, particularly for the youth. 

You see, the natives are the ones in any nation that are going to be the most willing to fight for it. 

They have a connection to the land, to the history, to the culture. 

I’d want to take away their desire to fight, by making them feel that there is nothing left to fight for. 

I would change the culture of the nation, through in part, immigration and pandering to other cultures over that of the nation, but I would also do that in the classroom at the earliest opportunity.  

Get them, young. 

Make the next generations, the adults of tomorrow, feel guilty for their heritage, guilty for their history, and even guilty for the colour of their skin. 

Tell them at every opportunity that they are privileged even when in many cases, that couldn’t be further from the truth. 

Because why would anyone fight to save something they have been conditioned to be ashamed of?

I would attack individual demographics and set them against each other, so as to negate any future unity among the masses. 

I’d set young against old, man against woman, black against white, straight against gay. 

I’d attack reality. 

2+2=5 and women have penises. 

I’d attack masculinity because masculinity says no to my destructive ideas. 

I’d attack women’s only spaces to create fear, children’s spaces to create even more fear and chaos. 

Ah, yes. Chaos. 

Always chaos, because people want order out of the chaos, and I can offer them that, if they just hand me what little freedoms they have left, in exchange. 

Another great way to create fear, chaos, and financial hardship, and therefore dependence, is war. 

I’d consistently pick fights with other nations. Big scary powerful nations like China, or Russia. 

I’d want lots of war, but only really, for now, the perception of it. 

So maybe a cold war of sorts. An endless one that is always just on the verge of kicking off, so I can terrify the population into accepting surveillance, and increased military spending, rather than, you know, spending the people’s money on the people. 

I would attack the food supply by making food production unsustainable. 

Whether it be financially, or through red tape, I’d make feeding the nation even more difficult. 

Actually, and I don’t know if anyone has ever thought of this, but I would actually pay farmers not to produce food.

Mad idea, I know. 

This would create scarcity, which drives up prices, further impoverishing the people, and creating state dependence. 

You can eat, but only if you do what we say. 

Only if you’re up to date with your boosters, and your digital ID, that we’ve introduced to combat the mass immigration we’ve facilitated, says your social credit score is ‘good little citizen’ enough for you to have some cricket based burgers. 

I’d buy up farmland and cover it in useless solar panels using billions of pounds of the people’s money. 

I’d blow up coal powered power stations, close collieries, block gas drilling licences, and instead insist that the nation be reliant on useless and massively tax payer subsidised ‘renewable energy’. 

I’d make travel unaffordable, because I wouldn’t want people seeing other areas of the nation, and twigging that this is being done everywhere, and not by accident. 

And that brings me to the final, most important part of my plan to destroy the nation. 

I would attack freedom of speech.  

I would make speaking the truth a crime. I would make thinking the truth a crime, and I would make seeing the truth… impossible. 

I would introduce legislation to ban freedom of speech, and to ban content that I don’t want the public to see, from their gaze. 

I would frame it as protecting the people, of course. 

I’d say it’s to protect the kids, or to protect minorities from ‘hate speech’. 

But of course that would simply be the sales pitch to get the legislation over the line, because I care not for the kids, minorities, or anyone else for that matter. 

I care about achieving the goal of destroying the nation, and a major hindrance to me enacting the many points I have listed, would be the exposure of the plan. 

That is why I would so aggressively attack, demonise and censor those exposing me. 

Now, this is just me riffing. 

This’s what I would do if my desire was to destroy the United Kingdom. 

Any connections between my hypothetical plan, and the actual realities of the UKs domestic policy, are completely coincidental. 

Of course. 

They can print what they want just as long as they spell the name right.

Make sure the paparazzi get my good side.

Being a bad boy or a bad girl isn’t just something that rarely comes back to bite you later on, in-fact it’s often a selling point.

The number of former gangsters with multimillion pound book deals, chart topping podcasts and Netflix series is testament to that.

The public like a flawed individual.

They quite like the idea of a bad man turned good. It makes them feel less guilty about their own indescretions, and provides them hope for their own future.

If this guy can turn it around, then so can I.

We like an underdog, and rightly or wrongly, bad lads are often viewed as underdogs.

They came from a rough area, had a tough start. Dad wasn’t around. You know the drill.

That reframing of historically bad people into reformed characters works for almost anything, if you have the right PR team.

Everything apart from child abuse, and paedophilia.

You don’t get to white wash that, and as you’ll realise by now, unless you’ve been living under a very very large rock for the last few years, the establishment is riddled with these vile creatures.

Vile creatures and sociopaths whose only desire that ranks above their twisted fetishes, is their need for power and dominance,

Or at least the perception of it.

That is why these people, if you can call them people, are the perfect blackmail fodder if your objective is nefarious.

Because sociopaths by their very nature, are void of empathy. That is evidenced by the simple fact that they abuse children in the first place,

Their lack of empathy allows them to blow up kids around the world, starve populations, to look the other way while children are abused by gangs of men they themselves have allowed into the country, and protected.

It allows them to increase taxes, remove support for the most vulnerable, to destroy the food supply, the energy supply, to inject children with poison and then attack the parents for demanding justice, to send bits of kids to die for the interests of billionaires.

It allows them to ignore intelligence and allow terrorist attacks to take place because the end goal always justifies the death and destructive means.

It allows them to bring down towers full of people, and turn them to dust, so they can use it as an excuse to go and kill another few million people on the other side of the world.

And they will do that at the behest of demons even higher up the food chain, all to protect their dirty little secrets.

Because they know deep down, that if that comes out, they are finished.

Even the greatest PR agency and off the charts marketing budget isn’t going to turn that round in the court of public opinion.

That’s why the Epstein files were never going to be released. There are too many people involved, too many sociopaths in survival mode, and too much political leverage still to be exploited.

After all, the world isn’t completely destroyed yet.

We aren’t all in our 15 minute smart cities, not quite living on universal basic income.

We aren’t all fully chipped and connected to the cloud, with AI doing all of our thinking, yet.

We haven’t quite embraced the world of “have no privacy, own nothing, and be happy”.

The agenda must continue, and to do that, the agents ushering it in, must be protected.

We the people must be distracted by talk of democratic hoaxes, Iranian space programs, and the arresting of Obama.

I wonder if Obama will end up in the same jail as Hilary Clinton.

Read more: The Establishment Is Fearful Of The Masses Uniting – And They Should Be